Scholarship (Affiliate)
Integrating Innovation Concepts into the Merger Control Context
Abstract
- This article discusses that static models in merger control are insufficient in the sense that they are not able to address the unpredictable and non-linear nature of innovation.
- Competition authorities often accept speculative innovation theories of harm while dismissing innovation defenses.
- A more neutral starting point in treating innovation is required by a fact-intensive, case-by-case analysis that incorporates dynamic efficiencies, spillover effects, and the long-term benefits of innovation.
- Finally, this article calls for a paradigm shift, moving away from static tools to a multidisciplinary methodology that ensures merger control fosters innovation and supports long-term welfare.
Read the full piece here.