Scholarship (Affiliate)

Integrating Innovation Concepts into the Merger Control Context

Abstract

  • This article discusses that static models in merger control are insufficient in the sense that they are not able to address the unpredictable and non-linear nature of innovation.
  • Competition authorities often accept speculative innovation theories of harm while dismissing innovation defenses.
  • A more neutral starting point in treating innovation is required by a fact-intensive, case-by-case analysis that incorporates dynamic efficiencies, spillover effects, and the long-term benefits of innovation.
  • Finally, this article calls for a paradigm shift, moving away from static tools to a multidisciplinary methodology that ensures merger control fosters innovation and supports long-term welfare.

Read the full piece here.