Showing Latest Publications

DOJ Disconnect: Do we really need a roadshow?

TOTM And now for something completely different. Being the only non-lawyer economist in the group seems to warrant such a preface sometimes. Read the full piece . . .

And now for something completely different. Being the only non-lawyer economist in the group seems to warrant such a preface sometimes.

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

TOTM My latest working paper, which bears the same title as this post, is now available on SSRN. In the paper, I address the challenge created . . .

My latest working paper, which bears the same title as this post, is now available on SSRN. In the paper, I address the challenge created by the Supreme Court’s 2007 Leegin decision, which abrogated the 96 year-old rule declaring resale price maintenance (RPM) to be per se illegal. The Leegin Court held that instances of RPM must instead be evaluated under antitrust’s more lenient rule of reason. It also directed lower courts to craft a structured liability analysis for separating pro- from anticompetitive instances of the practice.

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

Is the Intel/AMD Settlement Illegal?

TOTM So, AMD and Intel settled.  Its a case we’ve covered here in significant detail.  Terms haven’t been announced publicly.  AAI has predictably argued that the . . .

So, AMD and Intel settled.  Its a case we’ve covered here in significant detail.  Terms haven’t been announced publicly.  AAI has predictably argued that the settlement shouldn’t preclude further enforcement action from NY and the FTC.   The NY Times suggests the same.  They may be right, although Herb Hovenkamp, among others, has suggested that the settlement “has taken a lot of the wind out of the sails” of the FTC case.

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

PeaceHealth and De Facto Exclusive Dealing, Part III

TOTM Josh’s thoughtful response (Bitchslap? Nah.) to my post criticizing the Ninth Circuit’s recent Masimo decision raises a number of important matters. I started to just . . .

Josh’s thoughtful response (Bitchslap? Nah.) to my post criticizing the Ninth Circuit’s recent Masimo decision raises a number of important matters. I started to just submit a comment to Josh’s post, but then I figured a reply was post-worthy. (I don’t want the antitrust nerds who read these technical posts — and here’s to you, dweeby friends! — to miss the discussion.)

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Single Firm, Single Event Studies

TOTM Larry Ribstein points to the new paper from Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Valid Inference in Single Firm, Single Event Studies.  This is an important . . .

Larry Ribstein points to the new paper from Gelbach, Helland and Klick on Valid Inference in Single Firm, Single Event Studies.  This is an important paper with implications for finance, securities litigation and antitrust where event studies are frequently used as economic expert evidence.  Ribstein gives a good, non-technical explanation of its contribution…

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

Hayek and the Fall of the Wall

TOTM As we reflect back on the remarkable events of twenty years ago, and as we witness more and more centralized economic planning in our own . . .

As we reflect back on the remarkable events of twenty years ago, and as we witness more and more centralized economic planning in our own society, we should pause to remember what the fall of the wall revealed.

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Innovation & the New Economy

Should PeaceHealth Apply to De Facto Exclusive Dealing Claims?

TOTM Thom answers this question in the affirmative in his excellent post about the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Masimo and is disappointed that the Ninth Circuit . . .

Thom answers this question in the affirmative in his excellent post about the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Masimo and is disappointed that the Ninth Circuit rejected the discount attribution standard as the sole test for Section 2 in favor of a separate inquiry as to whether the bundled discount arrangement resulted in a substantial foreclosure of distribution and competitive harm.  Thom describes this reasoning as “sorely disappointing.”  I’m tentatively not convinced things are as bad as Thom sees them and want to explain why.  Maybe Thom can persuade me that I ought to be more upset about Masimo than I am.

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

Oracle is nonplussed; the DOJ is . . . plussed?

TOTM The European Commission has issued a Statement of Objections in response to Oracle’s proposed acquisition of Sun.  The deal had already cleared the DOJ’s review.  . . .

The European Commission has issued a Statement of Objections in response to Oracle’s proposed acquisition of Sun.  The deal had already cleared the DOJ’s review.  Oracle is none too happy about the development, issuing a strongly-worded statement.  Here’s a taste…

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection

As New York goes, so goes the FTC?

TOTM The New York Times is reporting that New York’s attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, has filed an antitrust suit against Intel.  According to the report… Read . . .

The New York Times is reporting that New York’s attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, has filed an antitrust suit against Intel.  According to the report…

Read the full piece here.

Continue reading
Antitrust & Consumer Protection