ICLE Amicus in Carr v Google
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE The International Center for Law & Economics (“ICLE”) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, global research and policy center committed to developing the . . .
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE The International Center for Law & Economics (“ICLE”) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, global research and policy center committed to developing the . . .
IDENTITY AND INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE AND SOURCE OF AUTHORITY TO FILE BRIEF The International Center for Law & Economics (“ICLE”) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, . . .
STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE This brief is filed on behalf of the Texas Association of Broadcasters, Texas Press Association, Texas Tribune, Freedom of . . .
Summary of Argument Courts should approach predatory pricing claims with caution because price cutting is central to competition and because false positive errors can chill . . .
Summary of the Argument The Court should grant the Petition because the court below erred in finding that the lack of explicit binding language or . . .
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT An interactive computer service’s automated recommendations qualify for statutory immunity under Section 230(c)(1). Congress enacted this policy choice in clear text, supported . . .
Interest of Amicus Curiae[1] The International Center for Law & Economics (“ICLE”) is a nonprofit, non-partisan global research and policy center aimed at building the . . .
Amici curiae are seventeen law professors, economists, and former government officials with expertise in antitrust, patent law, and law and economics.
In this brief for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, ICLE and 26 distinguished scholars of law & economics argue that the district court in a suit brought by Epic Games rightly found that Apple’s procompetitive justifications outweigh any purported anticompetitive effects in the market for mobile-gaming transactions.