Research Programs
More
What are you looking for?
Showing 9 of 22 Publications
Popular Media The New York Times reports that the most recent price for a taxi in New York medallion is $1,000,000. Wikipedia reports that there are 13,237 . . .
The New York Times reports that the most recent price for a taxi in New York medallion is $1,000,000. Wikipedia reports that there are 13,237 licensed cabs in New York. (A “medallion” is the physical form of a taxicab license.) This means that the present value of the rents created by limiting taxicabs is $13,237,000,000 — thirteen billion dollars. This is just the rents; the total lost consumer surplus is much greater because the lack of taxicabs creates substantial deadweight losses. For example, I am confident that many people have cars in New York only because they cannot count on getting a cab. Cabs change shifts during rush hour because they can earn less at this time and so that is when they go out of Manhattan to change drivers, just when demand is greatest. (This is also caused by the relatively too low price for waiting compared with the price for driving.) There is a proposal which will make it easier for limousines to pick up passengers. Of course, the taxi owners are opposed to this plan, but it would clearly be an efficient change.
Filed under: business, licensing, regulation Tagged: New York, Taxicabs
Popular Media I was invited to attend the Financial Times Global Conference “The View From the Top: The Future of America” and since I was in New . . .
I was invited to attend the Financial Times Global Conference “The View From the Top: The Future of America” and since I was in New York anyway I thought it would be fun. I don’t hang around with macro types much, and even less with liberal macro types. I will not summarize the entire conference, but a few observations:
Filed under: business, economics, Education, financial regulation, markets, sarbanes-oxley Tagged: macro
Popular Media Stewart Baker at the Volokh Conspiracy has a very interesting post on the new Amazon browser. He thinks it might revolutionize doing business on the Web, with a tremendous increase in security. . . .
Stewart Baker at the Volokh Conspiracy has a very interesting post on the new Amazon browser. He thinks it might revolutionize doing business on the Web, with a tremendous increase in security. This increase in security will entail a loss in privacy, so let’s hope the privacy guys don’t stop it.
Filed under: business, Internet search, markets, privacy Tagged: Amazon’s new browser
Popular Media In a much anticipated move, the Federal Trade Commission has started a formal monopolization investigation of Google . Because of its dominance in the search market, Google . . .
In a much anticipated move, the Federal Trade Commission has started a formal monopolization investigation of Google . Because of its dominance in the search market, Google has been in the antitrust crosshairs for some time now, both in the U.S. and in Europe. U.S. antitrust enforcers blocked a proposed joint venture with Yahoo in 2008, and more recently barely cleared the acquisition of travel site software company ITA. The E.U. is already investigating Google over allegations it has abused its dominant position in online search.
Popular Media The GAO has recently issued a report on medical devices. The thrust of the report is that “high-risk” medical devices do not receive enough scrutiny . . .
The GAO has recently issued a report on medical devices. The thrust of the report is that “high-risk” medical devices do not receive enough scrutiny from the FDA and that recalls are not handled well. This report and other evidence indicates that the FDA is likely to require more testing of devices. As of now, most medical devices are approved on a fast track that requires significantly less testing than that required for new drugs. (As I have discussed in a forthcoming Cato Journal article, medical devices are also subject to more immunity from state produce liability lawsuits.)
The GAO report is remarkable. The GAO defines its mission as
“Our Mission is to support the Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and ensure the accountability of the federal government for the benefit of the American people. We provide Congress with timely information that is objective, fact-based, nonpartisan, nonideological, fair, and balanced.”
But the report on medical devices is entirely unbalanced. It deals only with procedures for approval and the recall process (both of which are judged inadequate.) There is no discussion of either costs or benefits. That is, no evidence is presented that there is any actual harm from the “flawed” approval and recall processes. Even more importantly, there is no evidence presented about the benefits to consumers from easy and rapid approval of medical devices.
As is well known, virtually all economists who have studied the FDA drug approval process have concluded that it causes serious harm by delaying drugs. The import of the GAO Report is that we should duplicate that harm with medical devices. This is an odd and perverse way of providing a “benefit” to the American people.
Filed under: consumer protection, cost-benefit analysis, regulation, torts Tagged: FDA, Medical Devices
Popular Media The Wall Street Journal reports major conflicts between the DOJ and the FTC over antitrust jurisdiction. There are only two of them, and they are . . .
The Wall Street Journal reports major conflicts between the DOJ and the FTC over antitrust jurisdiction. There are only two of them, and they are not subject to rules against collusion and open agreements. Nonetheless, they can’t get along and they cannot decide on market division. Maybe they will take this as information about difficulties of collusion, even in duopoly situations.
Filed under: antitrust, cartels, federal trade commission
Popular Media Recently the Wall Street Journal had an article about medical billing errors. These can be very costly because they can impact your credit rating. But . . .
Recently the Wall Street Journal had an article about medical billing errors. These can be very costly because they can impact your credit rating. But there is one billing practice they missed. Some health care providers (we have found this with two and it is probably more common) begin the billing date as of the date of service but don’t send a bill until insurance has paid their part. Then when they do send a bill for the coinsurance it is “late” and they threaten to turn it over to a collection agency. In other words, the very FIRST bill you may get already has your account as delinquent.
Filed under: consumer protection, personal finance
Popular Media Two stories about Google indicate the dangers of antitrust in fast moving tech industries. Microsoft is urging the EU antitrust authorities to sue Google. . . .
Two stories about Google indicate the dangers of antitrust in fast moving tech industries. Microsoft is urging the EU antitrust authorities to sue Google. (Microsoft was itself the victim of a massive antitrust action. I guess it is true that abusers are likely to have been themselves abused.) At the same time Google is rolling out a new social tweak to its search function because it is losing business to Facebook. Let’s hope Google doesn’t sue Facebook. The Web was better when it was the Wild West.
Filed under: antitrust, technology
Popular Media Google’s efforts to make out of print books available online has run into a major stumbling block. Judge Chin ordered that books can only be . . .
Google’s efforts to make out of print books available online has run into a major stumbling block. Judge Chin ordered that books can only be digitized by Google if the author opts in; the agreement which he through out called for opt out. This is an shame and a highly inefficient result. As reported, the intricacies of copyright law and the unavailability of many rights holders means that opt in is not feasible in many cases. As a result, thousands of books will not be digitized at all. Instead of transferring rights to authors (which was apparently Judge Chin’s intent) he has simply destroyed valuable property rights. This case was argued as an issue of the distribution of rights, but it is really about the creation of rights — or, as it turns out, their non-creation.
Filed under: copyright, google, litigation Tagged: property rights