ICLE Scholars Available to Discuss United States v Google Decision
PORTLAND, Ore. (Sept. 2, 2025) – Antitrust scholars from the International Center for Law & Economics (ICLE) are available to discuss the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s just-released decision in the remedies phase of the United States v. Google case.
The court had earlier ruled in the liability phase of the trial that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act and illegally maintained a monopoly by entering into exclusive agreements to secure default distribution for its general search engine.
Relevant Resources From ICLE Scholars
- Scholarship: A Critical Analysis of the Google Search Antitrust Decision by Geoffrey A. Manne
- Scholarship: The Google Search Decision: The Merits, Fate, and Potential Impact of the U.S. District Court’s Decision on the Question of Liability by Daniel J. Gilman
- Scholarship: Findings of Fact May Be Stubborn Things on Appeal, Even if They Are Not Facts by Daniel J. Gilman
- Amicus: Law & Economics Scholars Amicus to US District Court in United States v Google
- Op-Ed: Perilous Remedies by Brian Albrecht
- Op-Ed: Government Hasn’t Made Its Antitrust Case Against Google by Daniel J. Gilman
- Blog Post: Avoiding Misguided Remedies in the Google Search Antitrust Case by Geoffrey A. Manne
- Blog Post: The Paradox of Google Search Remedies by Brian Albrecht
- Blog Post: DOJ’s Not-so-Modest Proposal by Daniel J. Gilman
- Podcast: Geoff Manne on the Google Search Trial
To schedule an interview with ICLE President Geoffrey A. Manne or other ICLE scholars, contact R.J. Lehmann at [email protected].
About ICLE
The International Center for Law & Economics is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center working with a roster of more than one-hundred academic affiliates and research centers from around the globe. ICLE scholars promote the use of law and economics methodologies to inform public policy debates.