• About Us
  • Our People
    • Staff
    • Senior Scholars
    • Board of Academic Advisors
    • Academic Affiliates
  • Research Programs
    • Antitrust & Consumer Protection
    • Data Security & Privacy
    • Financial Regulation & Corporate Governance
    • Innovation & the New Economy
    • Intellectual Property & Licensing
    • Telecommunications
  • Resources
  • tl;dr
  • News
  • Events
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Focus Area: vertical restraints

May 19, 2020

Against the Vertical Discrimination Presumption

Geoffrey A. Manne
"Platform competition is more complicated than simple theories of vertical discrimination would have it, and there is certainly no basis for a presumption of harm."
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
April 17, 2020

Correcting Common Misperceptions About the State of Antitrust Law and Enforcement

Geoffrey A. Manne
On Friday, April 17, 2020, ICLE President and Founder, Geoffrey A. Manne, submitted written testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
February 27, 2020

Making Sense of the Google Android Decision

Dirk Auer
The European Commission’s recent Google Android decision will go down as one of the most important competition proceedings of the past decade. Yet, in-depth reading of the 328-page decision leaves…
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
October 16, 2019

Does Apple’s “Discrimination” Against Rival Apps in the App Store harm Consumers?

Ben Sperry
For most people, the word discrimination has a pejorative connotation of animus based upon prejudice ... but another definition is a lot less charged: the act of making or perceiving a difference.
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
September 3, 2019

The District Court’s FTC v. Qualcomm Decision Rests on Impermissible Inferences and Should Be Reversed

Geoffrey A. Manne & Ben Sperry
Contrary to established Supreme Court precedent, the district court’s decision relies on mere inferences to establish anticompetitive effect. The decision, if it stands, would render a wide range of potentially procompetitive conduct presumptively illegal and thus harm consumer welfare.
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
July 10, 2017

The Washington Post editorial board understands online competition better than the European Commission does

Geoffrey A. Manne
Last week the editorial board of the Washington Post penned an excellent editorial responding to the European Commission’s announcement of its decision in its Google Shopping investigation. Here’s the key…
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
June 30, 2017

A few thoughts on the European Commission decision against Google

Nicolas Petit
Regardless of the merits and soundness (or lack thereof) of this week’s European Commission Decision in the Google Shopping case — one cannot assess this until we have the text…
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
May 9, 2017

Assessment of Procompetitive Effects of Organizational Restructuring in Ag-Biotech

Geoffrey A. Manne & Allen Gibby
The agriculture sector has seen significant technological innovation and organizational change over the last two decades, leading to increases in both farm productivity and profitability.
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
May 2, 2017

Are rules incompatible with the web? Let’s hope not: A response to Tim Wu

Geoffrey A. Manne & Neil Turkewitz
According to Cory Doctorow over at Boing Boing, Tim Wu has written an open letter to W3C Chairman Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, expressing concern about a proposal to include Encrypted Media Extensions…
Antitrust & Consumer Protection
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
International Center for Law & Economics
1104 NW 15th Ave, Ste 300
Portland, Oregon 97209
Logo © 2021, International Center for Law & Economics
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • RSS
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA Policy